Maxiom Technology — custom software development company

Govern & Modernize

AI code audit for SaaS in Northern Virginia

You need an AI code audit for SaaS in Northern Virginia that a senior engineer will stand behind. Multi-tenant architecture, review quality, and SOC 2 evidence have to keep up with how fast you ship. We write the scope before anyone touches a repository, keep your code in your environment, and name the engineer on the work.

Request an AI code audit

What you get

We deliver AI code audit for SaaS in Northern Virginia: a point-in-time senior review of what Copilot, Cursor, or Claude Code wrote into your codebase. Maxiom has built software since 2002 — more than $100 million in contract value across 221+ clients, with verified reviews on Clutch. Public case studies in this catalog include FiscalNote and CareMetx. We are headquartered in the Washington, DC metro area and work with teams in Northern Virginia. Teams shipping with Copilot, Cursor, or Claude Code typically start here: a fixed-scope AI Code Audit with written findings in 5–10 business days.

  • Senior engineers for AI code audit — Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code
  • Multi-tenant architecture, review quality, and SOC 2 evidence have to keep up with how fast you ship.
  • Written scope and NDA before repository or environment access
  • Named engineer on the deliverable — not a rotating ticket queue
  • Your source stays in your environment; we do not run client code through third-party AI tools
  • We are headquartered in the Washington, DC metro area and work with teams in Northern Virginia.
Request a scoping call Related service Industry page

What we hand back

  • Written findings, typically within 5–10 business days after read-only access
  • Severity-ranked security, architecture, compliance, and licensing risks
  • Live debrief with a named senior engineer
  • A clear next path: oversight, governed MCP, or you handle remediation

Why teams call Maxiom

Delivery risk hides behind velocity

AI velocity without senior review

SaaS teams shipping with Copilot, Cursor, or Claude Code often outrun review quality. Security gaps, licensing risk, and architectural shortcuts accumulate quietly.

Scanners marketed as oversight

Automated tools do not replace a named senior engineer reading the diffs. Questionnaires and auditors ask for judgment, not a PDF from a linter.

A forcing function on the calendar

Fundraise, SOC 2, HIPAA review, or a production incident. You need a written snapshot or an ongoing review retainer — not an open-ended discovery.

How an engagement works

Kickoff

  1. 01

    Align

    First call · 30 minutes

    We understand your stack, constraints, and what success looks like for AI code audit.

    • Stack, AI-tool usage, and delivery constraints
    • Timeline, buyers, and definition of done
    • Whether this engagement is the right first buy

    You get: a clear yes or no on fit

  2. 02

    Scope

    NDA · written plan

    You get a written scope before anyone touches a repository.

    • Deliverables, timeline, and named engineer
    • NDA signed before access
    • Read-only permissions by default

    You get: a committed written scope

  3. 03

    Execute

    Senior delivery

    The named senior engineer inspects the agreed scope — Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code output included — and drafts findings.

    • AI-accelerated work with senior review where it applies
    • Client code stays in your environment
    • Interim findings or demos on longer work

    You get: progress you can inspect

  4. 04

    Handoff

    Deliverable · debrief

    Written findings, a live walkthrough, and prioritized next steps.

    • Written findings or working software
    • Live walkthrough of critical items
    • Prioritized next steps — audit, oversight, or build

    You get: a signed deliverable and next path

Scoping

Talk to an engineer about AI code audit for SaaS in Northern Virginia

Tell us your stack, timeline, and constraints. We will tell you honestly whether Maxiom is the right fit — and what a scoped engagement would look like.

  • Free 30-minute scoping call — no hard sell
  • Written scope before any repository access
  • Senior engineers only on the work that matters
  • Response within one business day

Prefer calendar? Book a scoping call · hello@maxiomtech.com

Request a scoping conversation

Share a few details and we will follow up within one business day.

Frequently asked questions

The first conversation is scoping — stack, constraints, and whether we are the right fit.

What does Maxiom AI code audit for SaaS in Northern Virginia actually include?

We staff senior engineers for AI code audit for SaaS in Northern Virginia: a point-in-time senior review of what Copilot, Cursor, or Claude Code wrote into your codebase. You get written scope, a named engineer, and a deliverable you can inspect — not a junior bench and not a chatbot retainer.

How do we get started?

Schedule a 30-minute scoping call at maxiomtech.com/contact-us or email hello@maxiomtech.com. We cover your stack, constraints, and timeline. NDA and least-privilege access come before any repository work. The first conversation is scoping — not a sales pitch.

Does Maxiom use AI on client source code?

No. Client code stays in client environments. Delivery and review are led by senior engineers. We do not run your proprietary source through third-party AI tools.

Who actually does the work?

A named senior engineer is accountable for the engagement. We do not staff junior engineers onto client work or pass scanner output off as oversight.

How is this different from a typical AI code audit agency?

Most agencies optimize for bench scale. We optimize for judgment: senior engineers, written scope before access, named accountability, and production work since 2002. Clutch hosts verified client reviews — we do not invent testimonials for these pages.

How long does AI code audit take?

An AI Code Audit is a point-in-time engagement: written findings typically within 5–10 business days after read-only access. Larger oversight or build work is scoped in writing before it starts.

How is AI code audit priced?

Pricing depends on scope, integrations, compliance, and timeline. Most engagements start with a free 30-minute scoping call and a written estimate before work begins. We will tell you if we are not the right fit.

Can you work with our existing team and vendors?

Yes. We commonly embed alongside internal engineers, product managers, and incumbent vendors, with clear ownership and documentation at every milestone.

Do you have SaaS experience?

Yes. Multi-tenant architecture, review quality, and SOC 2 evidence have to keep up with how fast you ship. Public examples include FiscalNote and CareMetx. We staff senior engineers who treat those constraints as design requirements.

Is this a chatbot or RAG retainer?

No. This is senior engineering on your systems and your code. If agents need governed access to CRM, EHR, or ERP, that is MCP development — not a paste into ChatGPT. Teams rolling out Copilot, Cursor, or Claude Code usually start with an AI Code Audit.

Related solutions

Govern & Modernize

A point-in-time audit of what AI wrote into your codebase.

Govern & Modernize

AI code audit for Enterprise

Govern & Modernize

AI code audit for Federal

Govern & Modernize

AI code audit for Fintech

Govern & Modernize

AI code audit for Healthcare

Govern & Modernize

AI code audit for Healthcare IT

Not sure this is the right engagement? That is what the first conversation is for.

Tell us your stack, regulatory context, and timeline. We will tell you honestly whether Maxiom is the right fit.

  • NDA signed before access
  • Senior engineers every time
  • Written scope before work
  • Client code stays with you