SaaS

SaaS platforms where tenancy, billing, and review are design constraints.

Senior engineers for multi-tenant products under delivery pressure, not a time-to-market slogan or an uptime percentage we did not measure on your stack.

SaaS software engineering for products that have to survive tenancy and audit

SaaS work fails in the boring places: tenant isolation, subscription billing, API versioning, and the SOC 2 evidence enterprise buyers ask for. Maxiom engineers build and modernize those systems with senior review, including Copilot- and Cursor-assisted code on authentication, billing, and data-path code. Named product work in this repo includes Online Rewards, GoodCall, BrokerBlocks, and Hyperlogs. We have shipped software since 2002, with $100M+ in delivered contract value and 221+ clients. We do not invent user counts or uptime SLAs for a stack we are not operating.

2002
Founded
$100M+
Delivered
98%
Satisfaction

The problem

Tenancy treated as a later refactor

Feature velocity without isolation, noisy-neighbor limits, or a written tenancy model becomes an enterprise deal-breaker.

Billing and entitlements bolted on

Stripe (or Chargebee) is the easy part. Seat changes, usage, dunning, and plan exceptions are where SaaS engineering actually lives.

AI-assisted code on auth and data paths

Copilot and Cursor will generate the happy path. Tenant leaks and secret handling still need a senior reviewer who has shipped multi-tenant systems.

Named SaaS and product work

Online Rewards, GoodCall, BrokerBlocks, and Hyperlogs. Documented case studies, not an anonymous user count.

Since 2002

$100M+ delivered and 221+ clients. Clutch-reviewed. No invented uptime SLA on this page.

Senior-only delivery

A named engineer owns the work. Client code is not processed through third-party AI tools.

  • NDA signed before access
  • Read-only repository only
  • Senior engineers every time
  • Report in 10 business days

Frequently asked questions

What SaaS engineering does Maxiom actually do?

Multi-tenant architecture, billing and entitlement integrations, API design, and senior review of the paths that break tenant isolation or fail a security questionnaire. Staffed by senior engineers, not a feature factory.

Do you have a preferred tenancy model?

Shared database with tenant isolation is common; dedicated-database or hybrid shows up when enterprise contracts require it. The model is a scoping decision, written down before we touch your schema.

Can Maxiom implement Stripe or usage-based billing?

Yes. Billing is integration and edge-case work (trials, dunning, seat changes, usage meters), not a screenshot of a pricing page. Scope names the processor and the failure modes you already know.

Will you oversee AI-generated SaaS code?

Yes. AI code oversight reviews Copilot-, Cursor-, and similar output on auth, tenancy, secrets, and billing paths. Client code stays in your environment.

Do you build SaaS MVPs?

We will scope a first production slice when the product is real and the constraints are named. We do not quote an 8–14 week launch as a universal promise.

What about SOC 2 on a SaaS product?

Controls belong in access, logging, change management, and data handling. Compliance engineering and code review produce evidence from the system, not a questionnaire filled in after features ship.

Which SaaS products has Maxiom worked on?

Named case studies include Online Rewards, GoodCall, BrokerBlocks, and Hyperlogs. Ask for the ones that match your stack on a scoping call.

How do SaaS engagements start?

A scoping call on tenancy, billing, compliance pressure, and whether you need build, modernization, or oversight. Written scope and NDA before repository access.

Do you staff juniors on SaaS client work?

No. Client-facing engineers are seniors. A named engineer owns the engagement.

If tenancy, billing, or SOC 2 is already in the conversation, scope it with a senior engineer.

  • NDA signed before access
  • Read-only repository only
  • Senior engineers every time
  • Report in 10 business days