Human resources

HR platforms where employee data is the product, and the liability.

Senior engineers for HRIS, talent, and workforce systems. We do not quote hiring-cycle percentages we did not measure on your process.

HR software engineering for systems that hold employee and candidate data

HR tech is not a culture app with a dashboard. It is identity, payroll-adjacent data, recruiting pipelines, and access that has to survive SOC 2, GDPR/CCPA questions, and an HRIS your staff already lives in (Workday, ADP, BambooHR, Greenhouse). Maxiom engineers build and modernize those systems with senior review, including Copilot- and Cursor-assisted code on authorization and data-export paths. This page is not a staff-augmentation pitch; if you need to hire remote developers, that is maxiom.dev. We have shipped software since 2002. We do not advertise hiring-speed or uptime percentages as proof.

2002
Founded
$100M+
Delivered
98%
Satisfaction

The problem

A second HRIS next to the real one

Custom portals that re-implement employee records without a written source of truth create sync failures and access gaps.

PII treated like ordinary app data

Exports, admin impersonation, and vendor integrations are where HR systems actually get reviewed, and where AI-generated code is weakest.

Hiring-tool hype instead of workflow

Resume AI and engagement dashboards are easy to demo. Payroll-adjacent accuracy and audit trails are the job.

Since 2002

$100M+ delivered, 221+ clients, Clutch-reviewed. HR work is scoped engineering, not a hiring-speed statistic.

Senior-only delivery

A named engineer owns the engagement. Client employee data stays in your environment.

Integrations as the product

Workday, ADP, ATS, and payroll providers are systems of record. We do not pretend a greenfield HRIS is always the answer.

  • NDA signed before access
  • Read-only repository only
  • Senior engineers every time
  • Report in 10 business days

Frequently asked questions

Do you build a custom HRIS from scratch?

Sometimes, when the workflow does not fit a packaged HRIS. More often we integrate, extend, or replace a module next to Workday, ADP, or an ATS. That choice is a scoping decision, not a default product.

Is this a page about hiring Maxiom developers?

No. This is HR technology engineering. Staff augmentation and remote hiring live at maxiom.dev. Do not use this page as a bench-staffing brochure.

Can you integrate ADP, Workday, Greenhouse, or Gusto?

Yes, when those are systems of record. Integrations are scoped: identity, which objects move, and what must not be duplicated in a shadow database.

How do you treat employee and candidate PII?

Minimum necessary access, encryption, audit logging, and retention as architecture. SOC 2-minded delivery when that is the buyer’s bar. No “fully compliant” badge without an engagement.

Can AI screening or matching be in scope?

Yes, with a named engineer who will challenge training data, bias, and what gets stored. AI features are not a default add-on tile.

Will you review AI-generated HR code?

Yes. AI code oversight covers authz, exports, and integrations that leak employee data. Client code stays in your environment.

How do HR tech engagements start?

A scoping call on the current HRIS/ATS, which data is in play, and whether you need build, integration, or oversight. Written scope and NDA first.

Who staffs the work?

Senior engineers. A named engineer owns the engagement.

If the system holds employee data, scope it with a senior engineer, not a feature grid.

  • NDA signed before access
  • Read-only repository only
  • Senior engineers every time
  • Report in 10 business days