Human resources

HR platforms where employee data is the product — and the liability.

Senior engineers for HRIS, talent, and workforce systems. We do not quote hiring-cycle percentages we did not measure on your process.

HR software engineering for systems that hold employee and candidate data

HR tech is not a culture app with a dashboard. It is identity, payroll-adjacent data, recruiting pipelines, and access that has to survive SOC 2, GDPR/CCPA questions, and an HRIS your staff already lives in (Workday, ADP, BambooHR, Greenhouse). Maxiom engineers build and modernize those systems with senior review — including Copilot- and Cursor-assisted code on authorization and data-export paths. This page is not a staff-augmentation pitch; if you need to hire remote developers, that is maxiom.dev. We have shipped software since 2002. We do not advertise hiring-speed or uptime percentages as proof.

2002
Founded
$100M+
Delivered
98%
Satisfaction

The problem

A second HRIS next to the real one

Custom portals that re-implement employee records without a written source of truth create sync failures and access gaps.

PII treated like ordinary app data

Exports, admin impersonation, and vendor integrations are where HR systems actually get reviewed — and where AI-generated code is weakest.

Hiring-tool hype instead of workflow

Resume AI and engagement dashboards are easy to demo. Payroll-adjacent accuracy and audit trails are the job.

Since 2002

$100M+ delivered, 221+ clients, Clutch-reviewed. HR work is scoped engineering, not a hiring-speed statistic.

Senior-only delivery

A named engineer owns the engagement. Client employee data stays in your environment.

Integrations as the product

Workday, ADP, ATS, and payroll providers are systems of record — we do not pretend a greenfield HRIS is always the answer.

  • NDA signed before access
  • Read-only repository only
  • Senior engineers every time
  • Report in 10 business days

Frequently asked questions

Do you build a custom HRIS from scratch?

Sometimes, when the workflow does not fit a packaged HRIS. More often we integrate, extend, or replace a module next to Workday, ADP, or an ATS. That choice is a scoping decision, not a default product.

Is this a page about hiring Maxiom developers?

No. This is HR technology engineering. Staff augmentation and remote hiring live at maxiom.dev. Do not use this page as a bench-staffing brochure.

Can you integrate ADP, Workday, Greenhouse, or Gusto?

Yes, when those are systems of record. Integrations are scoped: identity, which objects move, and what must not be duplicated in a shadow database.

How do you treat employee and candidate PII?

Minimum necessary access, encryption, audit logging, and retention as architecture. SOC 2-minded delivery when that is the buyer’s bar. No “fully compliant” badge without an engagement.

Can AI screening or matching be in scope?

Yes, with a named engineer who will challenge training data, bias, and what gets stored. AI features are not a default add-on tile.

Will you review AI-generated HR code?

Yes. AI code oversight covers authz, exports, and integrations that leak employee data. Client code stays in your environment.

How do HR tech engagements start?

A scoping call on the current HRIS/ATS, which data is in play, and whether you need build, integration, or oversight. Written scope and NDA first.

Who staffs the work?

Senior engineers. A named engineer owns the engagement.

If the system holds employee data, scope it with a senior engineer — not a feature grid.

  • NDA signed before access
  • Read-only repository only
  • Senior engineers every time
  • Report in 10 business days