Compliance Engineering
SOC 2 aligned engineering, compliance-focused code review, and control implementation guidance.
Fintech teams move fast in regulated environments where payment data handling, SOC 2 evidence, PCI controls, and security review are part of every release cycle. Maxiom engineers build and oversee fintech software with compliance controls implemented in code — encryption, access management, audit logging, and change management evidence auditors can verify. We also provide AI code oversight for high-risk payment and authentication flows, tech debt resolution for high-growth codebases, and fractional CTO advisory for infrastructure and fundraising decisions.
The problem
Payment and customer data handling requires controls implemented in code: encryption, access management, audit logging, and change management evidence that auditors can verify.
AI tools accelerate feature delivery but can introduce vulnerabilities in authentication, input validation, and secrets management in high-risk code paths.
Rapid growth leaves shortcuts in core systems. Debt compounds until it slows enterprise sales cycles, increases incident rates, or fails due diligence.
SOC 2 aligned engineering, compliance-focused code review, and control implementation guidance.
Senior review of AI-assisted code in payment, authentication, and data handling flows.
AI Code OversightFractional technical leadership for infrastructure decisions, fundraising due diligence, and vendor evaluation.
CTO AdvisoryStructured debt inventory and remediation to restore velocity without stopping product delivery.
Tech Debt ResolutionA thirty-minute scoping call. We will map the right engagement — or tell you if we are not the fit.
Engineering under SOC 2 and compliance frameworks where audit evidence comes from code, not questionnaires.
Independent oversight focused on authentication, secrets handling, and data flow integrity.
CTO advisory for fintech companies approaching enterprise sales, fundraising, or major infrastructure decisions.
SOC 2 aligned compliance engineering, AI code oversight for payment and authentication flows, technical debt resolution for high-growth codebases, and fractional CTO advisory for infrastructure and fundraising due diligence.
Yes. Senior engineers independently review AI-assisted code in authentication, input validation, secrets management, and payment data handling paths — where AI tools most commonly introduce vulnerabilities.
Yes. Engineering under SOC 2 and compliance frameworks where audit evidence comes from code implementation — encryption, access controls, audit logging — not security questionnaires alone.
Structured debt inventory and prioritized remediation restore velocity without stopping product delivery — important when growth shortcuts start slowing enterprise sales or raising incident rates.
Yes. Advisory covers technical narrative for fundraising, due diligence readiness, infrastructure decisions, and board-level risk reporting with accountable senior ownership.
Authentication, secrets handling, input validation, payment data paths, audit logging, and change-management evidence — the controls auditors and enterprise customers scrutinize first.
Both. Maxiom delivers compliance-aligned engineering for new systems and independent oversight or remediation for existing codebases approaching SOC 2, customer security review, or due diligence.
No. Client code stays in client environments. Reviews and delivery use senior engineer inspection and established methods — proprietary source is not run through third-party AI tools.
With a scoping conversation about stack, compliance context (SOC 2, PCI-related controls), and timeline. Written scope and NDA come before any repository access.
Related pages
Scoping
Response within 1 business day