Compliant, secure software for financial technology teams moving fast in a regulated environment.

SOC 2 aligned compliance engineering, AI code oversight for payment and authentication flows, technical debt resolution for high-growth codebases, and fractional CTO advisory for infrastructure and fundraising due diligence.

Yes. Senior engineers independently review AI-assisted code in authentication, input validation, secrets management, and payment data handling paths — where AI tools most commonly introduce vulnerabilities.

Yes. Engineering under SOC 2 and compliance frameworks where audit evidence comes from code implementation — encryption, access controls, audit logging — not security questionnaires alone.

Structured debt inventory and prioritized remediation restore velocity without stopping product delivery — important when growth shortcuts start slowing enterprise sales or raising incident rates.

Yes. Advisory covers technical narrative for fundraising, due diligence readiness, infrastructure decisions, and board-level risk reporting with accountable senior ownership.

Authentication, secrets handling, input validation, payment data paths, audit logging, and change-management evidence — the controls auditors and enterprise customers scrutinize first.

Both. Maxiom delivers compliance-aligned engineering for new systems and independent oversight or remediation for existing codebases approaching SOC 2, customer security review, or due diligence.

No. Client code stays in client environments. Reviews and delivery use senior engineer inspection and established methods — proprietary source is not run through third-party AI tools.

With a scoping conversation about stack, compliance context (SOC 2, PCI-related controls), and timeline. Written scope and NDA come before any repository access.